Analisis Efektivitas Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Hindu
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Hindu Religious Education, Conceptual Understanding, Learning Motivation, Student EngagementAbstract
This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Hindu Religious Education learning, particularly in terms of learning motivation, conceptual understanding, and student engagement. This study employed a quantitative approach using a survey method by distributing questionnaires to 21 students. The data were analyzed descriptively using percentages to identify response tendencies and were interpreted by relating them to learning theories and previous studies. The results showed that Artificial Intelligence had varying effects on different aspects of learning. It was found to be most effective in supporting conceptual understanding, especially in helping students understand materials and solve practical problems. However, its impact on learning motivation and student engagement remained moderate and did not show significant improvement. These findings indicated that Artificial Intelligence functioned more as a cognitive facilitator rather than as a driver of intrinsic motivation and emotional engagement. Therefore, its use should be integrated with the active role of educators to ensure that the learning process becomes more meaningful and value-based.
References
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
De Bruijn-Smolders, M., & Prinsen, F. R. (2024). Effective student engagement with blended learning: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39439
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Efendi, Z., Hanim, M. A. F., & Santoso, A. (2025). Kecerdasan buatan (AI) dalam pendidikan: Tinjauan literatur sistematis tentang peluang, masalah etika, dan implikasi pedagogis. Jurnal Pendidikan, Kebudayaan Dan Keislaman, 4(3), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.24260/jpkk.v4i3.5052
Ezeugo, C., Amadi, E. C., & Amie-Ogan, O. T. (2025). Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools in Enhancing Educational Outcomes of Learners in National Open University in South-South, Nigeria. International Journal of Social Science and Management Studies, 4(4), 48–63. https://rajournals.org/index.php/ijssms/article/view/489
Hasanah, K. (2025). Systematic Review: Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Literasi Sains. Edukimbiosis: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.35905/edukimbiosis.v4i1.15118
Hassan, A. (2026). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance student engagement and academic performance in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13946-w
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., & Fischer, F. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will chatgpt g et you caught? rethinking of plagiarism detection. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34411-4_32
Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., louise Slade, E., Jeyaraj, A., kumar Kar, A., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., & ahmad Albashrawi, M. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Kurniawati, E., & Rindrayani, S. R. (2025). Pendekatan Kuantitatif dengan Penelitian Survei : Studi Kasus dan Implikasinya. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v3i1.596
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
Lodge, J. M., & Loble, L. (2026). Artificial intelligence, cognitive offloading and implications for education. https://leonfurze.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/ai-cognitive-offloading-and-implications-for-education.pdf
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2008). The psychology of the child. Basic books.
Rane, N. (2026). Artificial Intelligence-based Recommendation Systems for Personalized and Adaptive Learning Resources using Learning Analytics. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6372318
Sabri, M., & Wais, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence dalam Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan: Kajian Literatur dari Perspektif Inovasi Evaluatif. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v16i2.60738
Simamora, B. (2022). Skala likert, bias penggunaan dan jalan keluarnya. Jurnal Manajemen, 12(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.46806/jman.v12i1.978
Tlili, A., Burgos, D., Huang, R., Mishra, S., Sharma, R. C., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). Is ChatGPT a blessing or a curse? A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 1–15. https://squ.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/is-chatgpt-a-blessing-or-a-curse/
Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=RxjjUefze_oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Vygotsky,+L.+S.+(1978).+Mind+in+society:+The+development+of+higher+psychological+processes+(Vol.+86).+Harvard+university+press.&ots=okC_S0q_av&sig=oDJkpjk7FParj7itIkTqHI3OW-o&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S., Istenič, A., & Spector, M. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Computers and Education, 166, 104137. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542"
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Wayan Satria Darma Putra, Putu Wisnu Saputra (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
